Hello doctor,
As a result of recent intermittent chest pain, I have had two chest CT scans with contrast done within two days of each other. The first CT done at my cardiologist’s office was to measure my calcium score but noted a nonspecific ill-defined approximately 2 cm patch of ground glass with predominant right upper lobe attenuation present. The second CT scan, two days later, was done at a hospital and reported a ground glass lesion in the anterior right upper lobe measuring approximately 6 mm. More inferiorly, the ground glass lesion in the anterior right mid lung measures approximately 10 mm in anteroposterior extent. My calcium score was very low, and blood test results came slightly elevated for WBC, but otherwise good. My questions are regarding the ground glass lesion. I was told the body would likely absorb them and disappear. However, as the two reports differ in quantity and size of the ground glass, I am very worried. I was never a serious smoker but smoked on occasion about 30 years ago. If these nodules are nothing serious, how long would it take for them to disappear and be absorbed by my body? Is there any relevance to the reports being so different in quantity and size of the ground glass? I plan to consult with a doctor and know these have to be tracked. But is surgical removal an option? Please provide any information on these findings and questions.
Hello,
Welcome to icliniq.com.
I read your query and can understand your concern.
I have gone through the detailed history you have mentioned. First of all, the difference in size is huge in two different CT (computed tomography) scans, which are two days apart. Usually, this is not possible. Secondly, ground glass opacities are commonly seen with infection, inflammation, and allergies. The earliest symptom would be dry cough which is absent in your case. So it will be of great help if you can send me images of the CT scans. Also, let me know.
Please reply me with answers so that I can guide you better.
Thank you and take care.
Hello doctor,
Thank you for the reply.
I currently do not have the CT images. I do not have any allergies, fever, or dry cough. After the first CT scan, I took my usual medications of tablets Keppra and Ambien. Do you think the difference in size over just two days could be a radiologist error or different imaging centers' techniques? When would I expect these to no longer appear if they are not serious?
Hello,
Welcome back to icliniq.com.
I read your query and can understand your concern.
Usually, the error difference by machines or radiologists is very small, like 2 mm to 3 mm. But in your case, the difference is more than 5 cm. Can I see printed reports of both CT (computed tomography) scans?
And 2 mm ground glass opacity without any symptoms is not problematic. But 6 cm ground glass opacity should be evaluated. The usual regression time is two to three weeks, but we must first find out the cause. If possible, please send me your CT reports.
Thank you and take care.
Hello doctor,
Thank you for the reply.
I have attached the CT scan reports. Please inspect them and kindly suggest.
Hello,
Welcome back to icliniq.com.
I read your query and can understand your concern.
I have reviewed both CT reports (attachments removed to protect the patient's identity). The first report shows larger ground glass opacity with evidence of pulmonary embolism. The second CT is not showing any evidence of pulmonary embolism, and the size of the ground glass is also reduced. So the possibility of disappearing pulmonary embolism and related improvement in ground glass opacities is more likely. And please let me know.
1. Did your chest pain reduce after the first CT scan?
2. What was the exact location of chest pain?
Revert with answers.
Thank you and take care.
Hello doctor,
Thank you for the reply.
Yes, doctor, the second CT shows a reduced size but an additional lesion. Chest pain has been intermittent for over two weeks but has not been severe. The location of the pain is the top right.
Hello,
Welcome back to icliniq.com.
I read your query and can understand your concern.
Regarding the lesion, I still believe it is due to resolving pulmonary embolism.
Revert with the answers.
Thank you and take care.
Was this answer helpful?
|Same symptoms doesn’t mean you have the same problem. Consult a doctor now!
Introduction: Anxiety is becoming extremely prevalent in today's time ... More and more people are getting affected by anxiety as a result of deteriorating mental health, stressful lifestyle and work culture, and unhealthy food habits ...... Read full
Chest pain since 15 days. ECG & TMT reports are normal. What could be the problem?.. might be due to many reasons other than heart problem (primarily pleuritis - swelling of the lung membrane due to infection). Get your CBC (Complete Blood Count) and chest x-ray done to rule out this cause. Do massage on the affected area with a... Read full
CT scan shows non-growing lung nodules with scars. What does it suggest?.. found six years back would have manifested into multiple lesions by now if there were cancer and you are right in your thoughts. Usually, cancer nodules double in 30 to 180 days time and if the nodules did not change in six months then cancer is n... Read full
Also Read Answers From:
Comprehensive Medical Second Opinion.Submit your Case
Also Read
Ask your health query to a doctor online?
Ask a Pulmonologist Now