Patient's Query
Hi doctor
I hope you are doing great. Please see the attached reports for the viral markers and VDRL (Venereal Disease Research Laboratory)/RPR (Rapid Plasma Reagin) screening along with this query. These tests were taken after eight months and 19 days of exposure or 263 days post-exposure.
I just wanted to confirm if the test used in the attached report from the pathology laboratory for HIV Screening is a fourth-generation test. The heading of the test mentions "HIV 1 and 2 antibodies screening test, Serum," but if we go a notch below in the report, it mentions "HIV 1/2 and P24 Combo test (CMIA, chemiluminescent microparticle immuno assay)," which implies, as per my understanding, that the fourth-generation test was used.
The rest of the test details, like comments, description, etc., are rather silent and do not explain much about the test performed or the technique used, creating confusion in my mind.
Since the test is from the pathology laboratory, and you might be seeing similar reports in your regular practice, it would be really helpful if you could clear up my confusion and reassure me with this. I would like to know the exact window period for the anti-HCV antibody test for modern methods like CMIA/CLIA, etc., which are commonly used these days.
The CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) website mentions that "anti-HCV seroconversion occurs on an average of eight to 11 weeks with a reported range of two weeks to six months".
Further, the WHO (World Health Organization) fact sheet does not contain information about the window period for the HCV antibody test and only talks about the incubation period of the HCV virus in general, which is the same as "two weeks to six months," as mentioned above. Please clarify the window period from a more practical point of view.
What do you think is the most accurate measure of any window period? For instance, let us say the window period for the HIV I & II antibody test is 90 days. Now, some experts or health organizations quote it as 90 days, others as 12 weeks, and some as three months.
All of these, though similar, are not the same; 12 weeks equate to 84 days, and when taking three calendar months, we might generally exceed 90 days and may fall around 91/92 days(depending on the month).
Please help.
Thank you.
Hi,
Welcome to icliniq.com.
I understand your concern.
The HIV (human immunodeficiency virus) antibody test was done as a combo test in the attached report (attachment removed to protect the patient's identity), and it is negative. Therefore, it is conclusive as per the said dates, provided there is no further risk exposure.
Usually, HIV antibodies take two to six weeks to form if exposed. Therefore, an extended three months is given. Ninety days would be preferred, too. It does not make a difference for a person after 84 days of exposure, so 90 days would be preferred.
Similarly, HCV antibodies after three months of exposure would be preferred. Do not worry about it too much. You are going for the tests anyway, after 263 days of exposure. Remember the episode.
I hope this helps.
Please revert in case of further queries.
Thank you.
Patient's Query
Hi doctor,
Thank you for the reply. Just one small follow-up, as you mentioned above:-
You mentioned previously that the HIV antibody test in the attached report is a combo test, and it is negative.
Does the word 'combo test' imply that it is a fourth-generation HIV test?
Thank you.
Hi,
Welcome back to icliniq.com.
The fourth-generation test is a combo test, which detects both HIV antigens and antibodies.
I hope this helps.
Please revert in case of further queries.
Thank you.
Patient's Query
Hi doctor,
Thank you for the reply.
So that means that the HIV test in the attached report is a fourth-generation one, right?
Hi,
Welcome back to icliniq.com.
Yes, it is a fourth-generation test.
Kind regards.
Was this conversation helpful?
Answered byDr. Basti Bharatesh Devendra
Medically reviewed byiCliniq medical review team
Same symptoms don't mean you have the same problem. Consult a doctor now!
Disclaimer: No content published on this website is intended to be a substitute for professional medical diagnosis, advice or treatment by a trained physician. Seek advice from your physician or other qualified healthcare providers with questions you may have regarding your symptoms and medical condition for a complete medical diagnosis. Do not delay or disregard seeking professional medical advice because of something you have read on this website. Read our Editorial Process to know how we create content for health articles and queries.