What Is Alarm Fatigue?
Most of the clinical alarms are false, according to research. The large volume of false alarms has brought on alarm fatigue. When doctors hear too many sirens, it can cause alarm fatigue, a condition known as sensory overload that can lead to alarm desensitization and missed alarms. Alarm weariness has been linked to patient fatalities. Alarm fatigue has been a topic of emphasis for patient safety and regulatory bodies. Studies on quality improvement have shown that tactics including changing the ECG electrodes daily, preparing the skin properly, educating people, and customizing the alert parameters can reduce the number of false alarms. To determine if reducing alarm burden without sacrificing patient safety is possible, these and other solutions must be tested in rigorous clinical trials.
What Are the Strategies to Lessen Alarm Fatigue?
Alarm fatigue is the outcome of busy personnel becoming desensitized to frequent safety alarms due to repeated exposure. This desensitization may cause response times to lag or the failure to recognize critical alerts. The physiological monitor is one of the equipment that alarms the most in a hospital setting.
The following are the strategies to lessen the impact of each of the following factors that can lead to alarm fatigue:
-
Inconsistencies in the waveform.
-
Limitations, delays, and alarm settings.
-
Establishing alarms based on clinical populations as opposed to specific patients.
-
Employee training.
-
Patient instruction.
Inconsistencies in the Waveform:
Adhesive application and replacement issues, as well as inadequate lead preparation, might result in waveform distortions. Technical alarms such as "leads off" alarms that draw attention to system flaws may be triggered by these phenomena. Additionally, if the monitor mistakenly detects arrhythmias (problems with the rate or rhythm of heartbeat), they may result in alerts. Nurses should adequately prepare the skin for lead installation and change the electrodes daily to limit the frequency of waveform abnormalities. Additionally, lead wires and cables can have their signal-to-noise ratios improved with proper care and maintenance. In addition to having a policy on electrode changes, hospitals should also have one on lead wire and cable replacement and regular monitoring.
Limitations, Delays, and Alarm Settings:
The majority of hospitals just accept the device's factory-set values when it comes to parameters like maximum and minimum heart rates and SpO2 (oxygen saturation). Importantly, if the patient's baseline differs from that of the typical healthy adult population, these default settings might not satisfy workflow expectations. For instance, the baseline SpO2 of a patient with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) can be outside of the usual range for healthy adult individuals.
Other situations, like in pediatrics, may involve default settings that are inappropriate for a particular patient population. The alarm parameters should be prioritized by a cross-disciplinary committee, which will also decide whether the kind of alert (visual or audio, for example) will sound for each alarm state.
Next, the group needs to determine if the alarm will be sent to a backup device, like a pager or smartphone. The patient demographic and process specific to each unit should be the basis for these decisions. A few strategies that have been demonstrated to reduce the frequency of alarms include further personalizing alarms for each patient and altering the alarm's default settings to correspond with the patient population on the floor. The largest decrease in alarms is also demonstrated by combining adjustments to the alarm default with additional time between the alert and the provider communication. Reducing SpO2 alarm limits to 88 percent with a 15-second delay decreased alarms by more than 80 percent, according to one study.
Establishing Alarms Based on Clinical Populations as Opposed to Specific Patients:
A cardiac step-down unit's settings may differ from a pulmonary care unit, as was previously indicated in hospitals that set default values based on the entire patient group. While this kind of unit-based defaulting lowers alarms, it is not as successful as taking specific patient features into account.
When new patients join a unit, default settings are helpful because they can serve as a safety measure by flagging notable differences from the "normal" patient group. After sufficient data has been gathered, alarms should be set up according to each patient's unique "normal" and activated to the point where intervention or action is necessary. When a patient with COPD (airflow blockage and breathing-related problems) has a normal baseline SpO2 of 88 percent, for instance, a physician may choose to lower her SpO2 low alarm to 80 percent if necessary to intervene and get the patient's SpO2 back to baseline at that point. Implementing this patient-specific adjustment frequently requires extensive collaboration between clinicians and, occasionally, discussion at an appropriate hospital policy committee, as many hospitals forbid this kind of change without a doctor's prescription or authorization by two registered nurses.
1. Employee Training:
All change management initiatives are built upon the foundation of staff education. Default alarm limits and delays, patient-specific alarm settings, and electrode positioning and preparation have all been covered previously. Without adequate training and instruction for staff members, none of these initiatives will be successful. Studies have indicated that enhancing doctors' comprehension and proficiency with monitoring system usage through educational interventions reduces alarms. Additionally, there is a rising movement to limit patient monitoring to those for whom there are clinical indications. A practice standard for ECG monitoring in hospitals has been developed and ought to be assessed and implemented. This standard offers guidelines for improving the diagnostic precision of cardiac arrhythmia, ischemia, and QT-interval monitoring in terms of indications, timelines, and tactics.
A hospital discovered that a team-based strategy, along with a formal alarm management committee structure and broad-based teaching, resulted in a 43 percent decrease in critical alerts, even though the majority of educational efforts to date have concentrated on nurses.
2. Patient Instruction:
The goal of all previously described measures has been to lower the amount of warnings and notifications that the care team receives. Care teams, however, only make up half of the picture.
It is important to educate patients on the importance of alarms and what to do if they go off. In addition to allowing patients to take part in their care, this helps set expectations. When doing rounds, it is a good idea to talk to patients about how to use alarms and find out about their experience with them, particularly if they are bothering them when they try to sleep or rest. When discussing alarm settings and their modifications, it is important to solicit patient feedback and educate patients so they know why the adjustments have been made and what is expected to happen. Patients' likelihood of feeling the need to adjust or deactivate alarms themselves will decline as a result of this teaching.
Conclusion
The integration of alarms and alerts to notify physicians of potential problems made sense as soon as technology and monitors were introduced into the field of clinical care. The risks associated with being unaware of a potentially dangerous condition have been replaced with new risks, such as alertness and alert tiredness. The only worsening of the situation is the extensive use of computerized order entry. Increasing the informational value of each alarm has been a recent strategy to combat alert fatigue, as opposed to just adding more alarms. Reducing the amount of erroneous and clinically unimportant alarms is necessary to increase the usefulness of the information. One can lower the quantity of false alarms by minimizing waveform artifacts. It is necessary to set alarm defaults and delay using patient-centered strategies to increase the clinical significance of an alarm.
Lastly, training of personnel and patients is necessary for changes to be successful. The complexity of comprehending and operating in a complicated adaptive system is emphasized by the current study on alert management. To build a safer healthcare system, this complexity needs to be recognized and comprehended.
