HomeHealth articlesocular complicationsWhat Safety and Effectiveness Do Ocular Gene Therapies Offer?

Long-Lasting Clarity: Safety and Effectiveness of Ocular Gene Therapies

Verified dataVerified data
0

4 min read

Share

The effectiveness and safety of gene therapy used for ocular diseases relies solely on the choice of vector and route of administration.

Medically reviewed by

Dr. Gopal R. Damani

Published At March 12, 2024
Reviewed AtMarch 13, 2024

Introduction:

Ocular gene therapy remains a promising treatment approach for eye conditions, owing to its ease of accessibility, isolation from systemic circulation, and relative immune privileges for the eyes. Gene therapies have entered clinical trials for most retinal degenerative diseases. Most have shown promising visual improvement upon the initial assessment and over the long-term follow-ups. The adenoviral vectors (AAV) remain the most widely used and are considered relatively non-toxic. It is associated with a minimum immune response as it gets delivered intravitreally and subretinal and is thought to offer a long-term expression. However, ocular gene therapy remains in its infancy, with minimal registered trials to evaluate its effectiveness and safety. Hence, more clinical trials are needed to determine the long-term durability of the therapeutic efficacy of different vectors in human models.

What Are the Various Ocular Gene Therapy Clinical Trials and Their Effects?

Several ongoing clinical trials concerning gene therapies for various retinal and corneal diseases exist. For Leber’s congenital amaurosis, LCA, a childhood autosomal disease leading to vision loss, the first approved ocular gene therapy is in the third phase of a clinical trial. However, it has shown functional improvement in vision. Still, it does present with adverse effects like - increased intraocular pressure, cataracts, ocular inflammation, retinal tear, and adverse drug reactions. For retinitis pigmentosa, which causes progressive retinal dystrophy and loss of vision, a combination of gene therapy, engineering, and mechanics has come into play; the therapy shows partial vision recovery and seems well tolerated without showing any sign of intraocular inflammation and other changes. Some trials have shown to be well tolerated for age-related macular degeneration, while others have reported ocular inflammation.

Ocular inflammation remains one of the major setbacks for gene therapy. The eye is a site of immune privilege due to factors like the retinal eye barrier. However, the viral vectors' immunogenicity, capsids, and transgenes as foreign bodies activate the immune responses. There are still various factors that affect the immune responses.

How Long Do the Effects of Ocular Gene Therapies Last?

The duration of the effect of ocular gene therapy varies depending on the treatment, the eye condition, and the individual patient factors. Many ocular gene therapies have shown sustained and promising results in this regard, like offering long-lasting and permanent effects by addressing the root cause of the genetic disorder. The patients who undergo ocular gene therapy are monitored by long-term clinical trials to assess the durability of treatment effects and identify any potential safety concerns that may emerge over time. Very recently, Voretigene Neparvovec has been under clinical trials for inherited retinal dystrophy, and its therapeutic effect is expected to last for a decade in animal models and 7.5 years in human models.

What Are the Benefits and Limitations of Ocular Gene Therapy?

It has been found that gene therapy for the eyes has improved the patient’s eyesight. A slow expansion of areas of improvement was found for up to three years after the treatment, followed by contraction in this area. Many of those who underwent gene therapy underwent extensive eye testing for up to six years after treatment. In the follow-up results, it was found that, for up to three years, gene therapy improved the vision, but the photoreceptor cells continued to degenerate. Some scientists could track areas of retinal improvement and the changes with time. It was also found that though the RPE65 gene boosted the photoreceptor cell recharge cycle, cell death was not delayed. Regardless of treatment, the cells continue to die as they do in the natural course of the disease. Yet, another study found that in about 12 patients with LCA treated with gene therapy, the sensitivity improved but diminished after 12 months. It is stated that even though the current version of treatment does not appear to be the permanent treatment that is being hoped for, gaining knowledge over time could provide an opportunity to restore vision for a longer duration.

What Safety Measures Are in Place to Monitor and Address Potential Long-Term Side Effects of Ocular Gene Therapies?

Monitoring the potentially long-term effects of ocular gene therapy involves a comprehensive approach involving preclinical studies, clinical trial protocols, and post-marketing surveillance.

  • Preclinical Safety Studies: It identifies potential risks and informs the design of human clinical trials.

  • Phase I, II, and III Clinical Trial: Phase I focuses on a smaller population, and phases II and III focus on a larger population.

  • Adverse Event Monitoring: Involves regular assessment, lab tests, and careful documentation.

  • Long-Term Follow-Up Studies: It monitors the durability of treatment effects.

  • Collaboration With Regulatory Agencies: To ensure compliance with safety standards.

  • Risk Management Plans: It outlines strategies for monitoring and reducing risk.

  • Communication with Healthcare Professionals: To ensure that the healthcare providers know about the latest safety data and can provide appropriate patient guidance.

How Do Ocular Gene Therapies Compare to Traditional Treatments for Eye Disorders in Terms of Long-Term Effectiveness?

In terms of long-term effectiveness, the two vary depending on the action of treatment, stage of development of gene therapy, and the traditional interventions, with some general considerations being:

  • Target Approach vs. Systemic Relief: Ocular gene therapy is usually targeted and potentially curative.

  • Durability of Effect: Gene therapy has long-lasting effects; traditional ones require maintenance and repeat procedures to sustain effectiveness.

  • Precision Medicine: This will result in more personalized and effective treatment.

  • Treatment Modality: Traditional methods are mostly surgeries and medication, whereas gene therapy involves introducing genetic materials into the eyes.

  • Current Stage of Development: Under certain conditions, ocular gene therapy is still in its early stages.

  • Safety Profile: Long-term safety data are crucial for evaluating the overall risk benefits to balance any treatment.

  • Disease Modification vs System Management: Ocular gene therapy can modify the course of the disease, while traditional treatments focus on symptom management and slow progression of the disease.

Conclusion:

It must be realized that it is essential to recognize that the field of ocular gene therapy is dynamic. Patients considering treatment with ocular gene therapy must consult with their healthcare professionals to make informed decisions based on the latest information and an individual health consideration.

Source Article IclonSourcesSource Article Arrow
Dr. Gopal R. Damani
Dr. Gopal R. Damani

Ophthalmology (Eye Care)

Tags:

ocular complicationsgene therapy
Community Banner Mobile
By subscribing, I agree to iCliniq's Terms & Privacy Policy.

Source Article ArrowMost popular articles

Do you have a question on

ocular complications

Ask a doctor online

*guaranteed answer within 4 hours

Disclaimer: No content published on this website is intended to be a substitute for professional medical diagnosis, advice or treatment by a trained physician. Seek advice from your physician or other qualified healthcare providers with questions you may have regarding your symptoms and medical condition for a complete medical diagnosis. Do not delay or disregard seeking professional medical advice because of something you have read on this website. Read our Editorial Process to know how we create content for health articles and queries.

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. iCliniq privacy policy