Introduction
Congenital defects, infections, inflammation, neoplasms, iatrogenic damage, and trauma can all cause facial paralysis. The facial nerve and accompanying musculature are critical for eye closure, tearing, nasal breathing, smiling, eating, speech generation, and emotion transmission. When considering a patient for face reanimation, the underlying cause, level of injury, time of onset, viability of facial musculature, presence and status of the facial nerve, concomitant cranial nerve deficiencies, overall health, and patient's rehabilitation goals need to be taken into account.
Face reanimation aims to restore face functionality, symmetry, social interaction, and overall quality of life. Direct nerve restoration, in which the transected facial nerve is immediately reconnected, is the optimal strategy for face reanimation. Direct nerve repair produces the most effective results, enabling axon regrowth to reach the target muscles. In cases where direct nerve regeneration is not possible, other nerve transfer techniques can be used successfully.
What Are the Conventional Approaches to Facial Reanimation?
Initially, face reanimation surgery concentrated on techniques like cross-facial nerve grafting and nerve transfers. These techniques are intended for restoring facial expressions by attaching healthy neurons to paralyzed facial muscles.
However, these traditional techniques have limitations and may result in inferior patient results. Synkinesis, or irregular involuntary movements during desired facial expressions, is a typical problem with conventional reanimation surgery. This can happen when nerves are not appropriately specialized, resulting in misdirected axon outgrowth and the loss of independent influence over facial parts.
What Is the New Approach to Facial Reanimation?
The cross-facial nerve graft procedure includes using another normal facial nerve to regulate the paralyzed side. A functioning branch of the other facial nerve is sacrificed to re-anastomose the damaged distal branch. To tunnel over the face, an interpositional nerve graft, often the sural nerve, is utilized. Multiple segmental branches can drive numerous distant paralyzed branches, resulting in a more thorough reanimation.
Although the cross-facial nerve transplant procedure can create spontaneous and emotional movement, the results can vary. The axons can require up to 9 months to span the long interposition graft, with just some of the axons reaching the distant nerve branches. Another problem with this approach is that it weakens the normal side and loses power, making it less appealing to reconstructive surgeons. Nonetheless, the cross-facial nerve graft can be used in conjunction with other transfer procedures to restore upper division tone or as a bridge to the ultimate free gracilis flap transfer.
The different nerve transfers associated with facial reanimation include:
-
Hypoglossal Nerve Transfer: The hypoglossal nerve has been utilized for nerve transfers in facial reanimation. The traditional method involves total transection of the hypoglossal nerve, followed by reuniting with the main trunk of the facial nerve. Although this procedure can give enough facial tone and movement, it is accompanied by severe morbidity, including tongue hemiatrophy and speaking, mastication, and swallowing issues. Several improvements to the hypoglossal nerve transfer procedure have been developed to alleviate these morbidities. Among the changes are end-to-side anastomosis with or without an interposition graft, partial transection of the hypoglossal nerve with longitudinal neurotomy, and lateral-terminal anastomosis. The application of interposition grafts has been demonstrated to increase recovery time, whereas the longitudinal neurotomy technique eliminates the requirement for two reunion sites but increases the chance of hypoglossal nerve injury.
-
Masseteric Nerve Transfer: Recently, the masseteric nerve transfer has been found as an alternative to the hypoglossal nerve transfer. Using the subzygomatic triangle as a landmark, the nerve to the masseter branch of the trigeminal nerve can be easily and accurately recognized. With a large number of motor axons, the masseteric nerve provides minimal donor site morbidity, rapid re-innervation, and maximum possible movement. During the masseteric nerve transfer, the nerve is dissected and tension-freely reunited with the primary facial nerve trunk or distant nerve branches. Patients learn to smile while clenching their teeth in order to activate the masseter muscle, restoring facial movement. The masseteric nerve transfer has proven good outcomes in studies, with high rates of success and extent of movement. It also has a lower morbidity rate when compared to hypoglossal nerve transplantation.
-
Combination Nerve Transfers: Along with individual nerve transfers, combination nerve transfers are becoming increasingly common in facial reanimation. Multiple nerve transfers are used in these surgeries to maximize the benefits of each approach. A combination of masseteric and hypoglossal nerve transfers, as well as cross-facial nerve grafts, can produce virtually symmetrical lip elevation and oral commissure extension with no obvious synkinesis. In patients with facial paralysis, combination nerve transfers ensure faster recovery, superior functional outcomes, and expressive movement. Reconstructive surgeons may customize treatment plans to each patient's specific demands and goals by utilizing the benefits of different nerve transfers and creating surgical approaches customized to individual circumstances.
What Are the Complications Associated With Facial Reanimation?
-
Failure to attain the expected result is the major issue associated with facial reanimation, and other problems like hematomas, poor wound healing, and infection are possible.
-
Timing is important for the greatest results, and several operations must be performed within 12 to 18 months after the onset of symptoms to be successful.
-
Other risks include functional impairment of the facial nerve on the normal side, weak muscle contraction and an inadequate smile on the paralyzed side, worsened paralysis, skin-to-transferred-muscle adhesion, insufficient transverse smile motion, bulky cheeks, pronounced facial asymmetry, and unaesthetic muscle tension.
Conclusion
Individuals with facial paralysis can restore facial function and enhance their quality of life by utilizing facial reanimation methods such as nerve transfers. While direct nerve repair is still considered the gold standard, various nerve transfer procedures, such as cross-facial nerve grafts, hypoglossal nerve transfers, and masseteric nerve transfers, have produced promising results. Combination nerve transfers are also being investigated to enhance the benefits of several methods. Patients can benefit from considerable facial function, symmetry, and beauty improvements by combining advanced surgical methods with a comprehensive care approach. Through continuous research and development, the future of facial reanimation holds enormous promise for improved outcomes and greater patient well-being.
